The
2008 assembly elections in Karnataka were significant for the state in a number
of ways. The following is an attempt to analyze the 2008 assembly
elections and to extrapolate implications on the 2013 if possible. As always
perhaps a look at the events in lead-up to the polls is a good place to start
Leadup to 2008:
In its short democratic history of about 60 year, Karnataka has seen as many as 21 Chief Ministers. It has been common for Chief Ministers to be unable to complete their full 5 year term, many of them falling to internal bickering in the course of their term. Devaraj Urs(in 1972) and S.M Krishna (in 1999) have been the only two exceptions to this.
When elections were held in 2004 after S.M. Krishna completed his
full term, the verdict was highly fractured, plunging the state into 5 years of
political uncertainty. The BJP emerged as the single largest party with
79 seats followed by Congress with 65 and JD(S) with 58.
The grand ‘betrayal’: The Congress and JD(S) formed a coalition government with Dharam
Singh as the Chief Minister. The Dharam Singh government collapsed after a
split engineered by Kumaraswami, who went on to become the CM of a power
sharing coalition government with the BJP . The agreement was to split the
remaining term 20 months each. However when Yeddyurappa’s turn came Kumaraswami
refused to step aside, leading to the BJP withdrawing support reducing the
government to a minority. Kumaraswami relented later, and Yeddyurappa was sworn
in as chief minister only for Kumaraswamy to pull out the rug 7 days
later over some disagreements in sharing ministries leading the state into a 6
month period of presidents rule. This one month drama that played out in
Bangalore in October- November 2007 created a very sorry image of the states
politics. From this episode, JD(S) and specifically DeveGowda/Kumaraswami
emerged from this farce as distinct villains in public perception.
A contrast in leaderships: This was
exploited to the hilt by the BJP which portrayed it as a betrayal of not just
the party, but of the entire Lingayat community, and by extension northern
Karnataka, by a party lead by a Vokkaliga from the south. Yeddyurappa a strong
leader of the Lingayat community, was clearly and unambiguously promoted as the
chief ministerial candidate by the BJP to further exploit this sense of betrayal.
On the other hand the congress did not have a clear CM candidate. The last
minute recall of S.M.Krishna to the state from the governorship of Maharashtra
was too little too late.
Delimitation: Another important event that happened
between 2004 and 2008 elections was that electoral constituency boundaries were
drastically redrawn as a part of the delimitation process, to better represent
the movement in populations. A full analysis of this is perhaps not appropriate
for this post but there were two important outcomes from the process. Firstly,
the number of urban constituencies drastically increased. For example the
number of constituencies in the the two districts of the greater Bangalore
region increased from 25 to 36. The second consequence was that the number of
seats reserved for SC and ST candidates also increased from 35 to 51.
Result - 2008
The Results of Karnataka-2008 marked an important transition for
the BJP. In the short history of its existence the BJP has always been seen as
a party of the Hindi heartland. Its leaders took great pride in their chaste
Hindi, and even at the height of its popularity in 1999, when it formed the
government at the center, it did not really make an impact in the vernacular
periphery of the country. It was literally absent from the south, north-east
and parts of the east. By emerging as the single largest party and almost
garnering a majority in Karnataka the BJP took a step towards becoming truly a
national party.
In all the BJP garnered 109 of the 224 seats, falling just 4 short
of a simple majority. The congress was a distant second with 80 seats.
The BJP took this 29 seat lead over the Congress inspite of garnering a
lower vote share (~1%) than the Congress (vote shares are represented by the light grey bars in above graphic). The BJP’s all in strategy with
promoting a Lingayat as leader evidently reaped rich rewards in the Lingayat
heartland of Bombay Karnataka and Central Karnataka. In both these regions the
BJP secured more than twice the number of seats as both its opponents combined.
In spite of its internal bickerings the Congress maintained
a good performance in its traditional stronghold of Hyderabad Karnataka
and Mysore region, where they benifitted from the slide in the fortunes of the
JD(S).
The figures from coastal Karnataka on the other hand seem to belie
the image of saffron heartland and BJP bastion. Even though the BJP won the
majority of seats here, once again it actually secured less votes than the
congress in the region.
The same story repeated itself in the Bangalore region where BJP
ended up winning 5 seats more than the BJP in spite of having a lower vote
share. Both of these factoids may be pointers to poor prioritization and
election management by the Congress. Overall the performance of the Congress
seems to reflect the state of its leadership in the state, scattered and
without focus.
Coming back to 2013, Once again the BJP seems to be going for the caste based permutation with a Lingayat at the helm. Once again the congress has not called out a clear leader. Siddharamaiah, Mallikarjuna Kharge, Veerappa Moily, Dharam Singh, JH Patel, Oscar Fernandez and even the likes of SM Krishna, Margaret Alva and C.K Jaffer Sherief could all be in the fray. And the JD(S) again looks like being restricted to Mysore region as a player.
However a lot has changed in 5 years. In terms of appeal as a mass
leader Shettar is no Yeddyurappa. And Yeddyurappa himself is now out of the BJP
forming a separate political party, the KJP. The Reddy brothers who were
purportedly bankrolling the BJP are now in prison, and not just that they now
have a political outfit of their own. At the least the BSR Congress is likely to erode the 8/8
that the BJP got from Bellary last time around.
Most importantly, last time around the BJP was at the receiving
end of sympathy, the one that had been betrayed. This time in the eyes of many
people, it is the betrayer, of the trust that the people of the state
reposed in it, having squandered a golden opportunity amidst its bickering.
No comments:
Post a Comment